Principle | Case Name / Definition |
Enrolled Bill Rules | If it should appear a bill has been passed through both houses of Parliament and received the Royal Assent, no court of justice can inquire into the mode in which it was introduced into Parliament, not what was done previous to its introduction or what passed in Parliament during its stage through both houses. Lord Campbell, Edinburgh and Dalkeith Railway Co. v Wauchope [1842] |
Parliamentary Sovereignty | The principle of Parliamentary Sovereignty means neither more nor less this, namely, that Parliament has, under the English constitution, the right to make or unmake any law whatever; and, further, that no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having a right to set aside the legistration of Parliament. AV Dicey a. Parliament is the supreme law making body and make laws on ANY matter b. Parliament cannot bind its successors c. No body (including courts) can question the validity of an Act of Parliament |
affirm Edinburgh and Dalkeith Railway v Wauchope | Pickin v British Railways Board [1994] HL said it had no constitutional authority to investigate the allegations that the act was improperly passed and so enforced the Act |
Quorum | HC = 40, HL = 30 |
Procedure of making a Bill into Act | 1st reading > 2nd reading > committee stage > report stage > 3rd readig > HL > Royal Assent |
An earlier EU law prevailed over later conflicing national law to the extent of the conflict | Costa v ENEL |
Not necessary for the national court to request or await the prior setting aside of the provision by legislative or other means | Simmenthal |
Conflict between EU and a MS's constitution. Whether the nature of the EU law, prevails over any conflicting provisions of a Bill of Rights in a MS's constitution | Internationale Handelsgesellschaft |
Forbids any discrimination against EU citizens on grounds of nationality | TFEU Art 18 |
Direct Effect | Van Gend en Loos critera 1. Clear and Precise 2. unconditional 3. not subject to further implementation by the MS or the EU |
Implied Repeal | Vauxhall Estates v Liverpool Corporation [1932] |
presumption of non-retrospectivity | Burmah Oil Co Ltd v Lord Advocate [1965] - receives compensation for destroyed plantation War Damages Act 1965 - no compensation retroactively exempts the Crown from liability in respect of damage to, or destruction of, property caused by acts lawfully done by the Crown during, or in contemplation of the outbreak of, a war in which it is engaged |
Effects of Factortame | 1. Doctrine of implied repeal will not stop directly effective EU law prevailing 2. Direct applicable EU law will prevail over conflicting national law by reason of s2(4) ECA 1972 |
ECtHR - Interstate application | ECHR article 33 |
ECtHR - Individual petitions | ECHR article 34 |
ECtHR - Cannot be made until all domestic remedies have been exhausted and within 6 months of any final domestic decision | ECHR article 35 |
HRA 1998 - mechanisms for courts to deal with legislation that conflicts with convention rights | s3 (interpretation), s4 (declaration of incompatibility), s10 fast track procedure - a government minister can amend a conflcting statute by laying a statutory instrument before Parliament |
HRA s3 | R v A (No. 2) [2002] Courts may adopt an interpretation which may appear linguistically strained - Lord Steyn "modifying, altering, or supplementing the words" (Lord Hope) |
HRA s3 | Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] cannot have intended that in the discharge of this extended interpretative function the courts should adopt a meaning inconsistent with a fundamental feature of legislation |
HRA s4 | R v A - Declaration of incompatibility is a last resort - Lord Steyn Ghaidan - Lord Steyn - Interpretation under s3(1) is the prime remedial remedy and resort to s4 must always be an exceptional case R (Anderson) v SSHD [2002] courts have been warned to refrain from 'judicial vandalism' in using s3 |
HRA s10 | The government minister may respond by making a remedial order under s10 - conflict removed - no violation |
HRA s8 | Remedies |
Removed the HL's legislative veto, can now delay legislation foy 1 year apart from Money Bills and Bills to extend the life of Parliament | Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949 |
The Enrolled Bill Rule only applies... | to Acts of Parliament NOT resolutions |
Friday, June 17, 2016
Public Law - Parliamentary Sovereignty
Labels:
Law,
Parliamentary Sovereignty,
Public Law
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment